Bitdefender go to my blog and avast are two of the most popular ant-virus applications in the world, guarding a huge number of devices coming from viruses and malware. Even though both have their particular advantages and drawbacks, selecting between them can be a difficult task pertaining to users.

If you would like to know if Bitdefender or avast is the better choice for you personally, you need to consider how they compare and contrast in several significant categories, which include protection, performance, extra features and cost. Below, we will go through each of these and give you a comparison with the pros and cons of every one.

Cost and Performance

A paid adaptation of a security program can be an expenditure, so you want to be certain it works well for you. Fortunately, equally Avast and Bitdefender give a 30-day money-back guarantee to help you assess if it’s well worth the pay for.

Scans and User Interface

Both Avast and Bitdefender offer a wide range of reads, by basic secureness checks to custom kinds. They also add a boot-time scanning device and sandboxing, which can be especially valuable if you’re accessing or beginning files that may contain dangerous viruses.

Drive Utilization and Scan Period

As part of the testing, AV-Test analyzed each program’s impact on hard disk drive utilization. They measured the amount of storage space each used on first-run file burning, application roll-out and downloads, as well as if a full scan was operating.

Avast and Bitdefender equally showed much the same results, yet Avast drew significantly more from the drive. This is especially visible when managing a full program scan. In the test system, Avast necessary almost two hours to run a check out, although Bitdefender had taken only about half that time.